What’s My Opinion of the Lens Creator Tool?

I got bombarded by emails and private messages yesterday about a new Squidoo lens creator tool being sold. Everyone wanted to know what I thought about it, so here goes:

Although I like the idea behind it, I wasn’t impressed.

Nothing against the creator. I think his vision might be a good one. But it shouldn’t have been released in its minimal state as it is. It wasn’t a time saver to me and I felt like it was more of a hassle than a blessing.

The tool lets you enter your Squidoo login information.

Then you either type in a title or let it create one based on your file name (for the Txt document you’re going to pull content from).

Next, you choose if you want it to prompt you, stop creating the lens, or just add some digits onto the end of the URL if the one it wants to create isn’t available.

(So let’s say your Txt file name was “how to train dogs.” It would try to grab squidoo.com/how-to-train-dogs and if that wasn’t available, it would tack on a few numbers or letters to the end of it, like how-to-train-dogs8s6dn or whatever.)

Then you either Max the lens or not, choose to publish or not, and categorize it. (See to me, it’s not a shortcut – you’re still doing much of the same work).

Then you go to the right side and choose the file you want it to get content from. Click continue and it creates and publishes the lens.

But it only supports Write/Text modules. Nothing else. So you’re going to have to go back into Add modules and add more anyway. It’s not going to wear me out clicking Add to 1-2 more Text modules, so this tool, while the idea is okay, isn’t something I’d spend money on again.

Another drawback to this being released is “here we go again!” We just got over a big smackdown from Google about spam and what do you think is going to happen with this tool?

Some idiots are going to use it to flood Squidoo with their PLR content that’s not altered and then we’re going to have lens after lens of rehashed material. By the way, Squidoo headquarters already knew about the tool, so you can bet they’re going to be watching for cookie cutter lenses and they’ll shut them down without warning. Be VERY careful if you DO use this tool and alter everything and make it unique.

Just a warning and my $0.02.

And hey – if you bought it, give your own accounting of what you thought here.

I’d be interested to hear varying opinions. No one person knows everything, and maybe I’m missing something crucial with this tool.

Tiff :)

Written by tiffadmin on January 18th, 2008 with 5 comments.
Read more articles on Lens Modules and Uncategorized.

Related articles

5 comments

Read the comments left by other users below, or:

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Marian
#1. January 18th, 2008, at 12:45 PM.

Hi Tiff, the tool can actually be a time saver, since I know how slow the Squidoo interface is. If the author adds some other modules (there are on the way anyway), it can be pretty fast to create the lens.

Of course, someone may abuse the tool - but it’s the same with every other tool made primarily for good purpose (especially time saving)…

I’d give it a try..

Marian

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com tiffadmin
#2. January 18th, 2008, at 12:58 PM.

Hi Marian,

That’s one major point I agree with - where I said it was released too early. It only support Text modules. Needs t be a one-stop shop and then maybe it’d be valuable to us, but I’m still having to go in anyway.

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Doug
#3. January 18th, 2008, at 1:46 PM.

Have to agree with the “Google worry”, Tiff.

The tool itself may end up being nice once complete, but it is going to provide an even easier method of spamming the heck out of Squidoo. Hopefully HQ keep a very sharp eye on this and removes offending lenses quickly.

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com Paul
#4. January 18th, 2008, at 6:56 PM.

Tiff

Thanks for taking the time to review the tool and to feedback on it.

I share your concern that it will be used by the spammers and we will be back into that quite dreadful slap period again! At full price ($67 I believe) I find it hard to understand where the value is given the limitations you have highlighted.

Thanks again

Take care

Paul

Get your own gravatar by visiting gravatar.com John
#5. January 19th, 2008, at 5:46 PM.

Tools like this can be a big timesaver, but as soon as they’re promoted for use with all those PLR articles sitting on your hard drive, it throws up a big flag for me. Chances are 99% of those PLR articles are unedited.

We all know that Squidoo doesn’t want a whole bunch of lenses with nothing but unedited PLR articles for content. Even if they haven’t come right out and said so, it’s just common sense. And I’m sure they don’t want to suddenly have to monitor all the new, crappy lenses that are popping up even faster if the tool gets a lot of users.

A certain percentage of the people who use these kind of tools don’t care about being responsible, or may not even realize it’s not going to benefit anyone to just mass create Squidoo lenses filled with PLR content.

Besides, hasn’t Squidoo already clamped down on barebones lenses with nothing but a single text module?

In my opinion, a tool is just a tool - it’s not good or bad. The people that use it make it one or the other. But when it’s promoted in a way that suggests using it for something that probably isn’t going to be acceptable to Squidoo, it’s a bad sign.

I suspect if it does start to get widespread use and is being abused, Squidoo will quickly find a way to stop it.

Leave your comment...

If you want to leave your comment on this article, simply fill out the next form:




You can use these XHTML tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

Controversy and Psychology in the Web 2.0 Atmosphere

Sign Up for the Challenge or to Receive Updates

Still Don't Have Squidoo?